HR
in Knowledge Era
Contributed one chapter title “HR in Knowledge Era” in the Edited Book entitled “Role of Knowledge Management in Modern Era” Published in the year 2013 by Paramount Publishing House, New Delhi. ISBN: 978-93-82163-91-6.
Written by Dr. Gandham Sri Rama Krishna
Contributed one chapter title “HR in Knowledge Era” in the Edited Book entitled “Role of Knowledge Management in Modern Era” Published in the year 2013 by Paramount Publishing House, New Delhi. ISBN: 978-93-82163-91-6.
“Knowledge
is the only meaningful resource today”
è Peter
F. Druker
Introduction
Liberalization,
Privatization, and Globalization have influenced all segments of society. While
the impact is minimal in some sectors, it is widespread in others. Business
organizations in India ,
therefore, not only face competition from global players, but more so from the
domestic players. Therefore, organizations need to be more innovative,
competitive, and proactive in their endeavours. There is an urgent need to
anticipate, advocate, and accelerate the change processes in the business
environment and act accordingly. The gaps that demand attention in
organizations, especially from HR functionaries, are talent gaps, knowledge
gaps, and strategy gaps. It becomes essential, then, to redefine and transform
HR practices from the traditional reactive approach to those that can
anticipate business needs and provide solutions for them.
Knowledge
is the full utilization of information and data, compelled with the potential
of people’s skills, competencies, ideas, intuitions, commitments and
motivations. Knowledge is more relevant to sustained business then capital and
land. Nevertheless it remains the most neglected asset.
A
holistic view considers knowledge to be present in ideas, judgments, talents,
root causes, relationships, perspectives and concepts. Knowledge is stored in
the individual brain or encoded in organizational processes, documents,
products, services, facilities and systems. Knowledge is the result of learning
which provides the only sustainable competitive advantage. Knowledge is action,
focused innovation, pooled expertise, special relationships and alliances.
Knowledge is value-added behavior and actions.
Knowledge
management is an audit of intellectual assets that highlights unique sources,
critical functions and potential bottlenecks which hinder knowledge flows to
the point of use. It protects intellectual assets from decay, seeks
opportunities to enhance decisions, services and products through adding
intelligence, increasing value and providing flexibility. Knowledge management
complements and enhances other organizational initiatives such as total quality
management (TQM) business process re-engineering (BPR) and organizational
learning, providing a new and urgent focus to sustain competitive
position.
Knowledge
management comprises a range of strategies and practices used in an
organization to identify, create, represent, distribute and enable adoption of
insights and experience. Such insights and experiences comprise knowledge,
either embodied in individuals or embedded in organizations as processes or
practices.
Knowledge
management efforts typically focus an organizational objectives such as
improved performance, competitive advantage, innovation, the sharing of lessons
learned, integration and continuous improvement of the organization. Knowledge
management efforts overlap with organizational learning and may be
distinguished from that by a greater focus on the management of knowledge as a
strategic asset and a focus on encouraging the sharing of knowledge.
Knowledge Management - A Key
Emerging Area
·
According to Webster’s Dictionary,
Knowledge is the fact or condition of knowing something with familiarity gained
through experience or association. Knowledge refers to ideas or understanding which an individual
possesses, and those that are utilized effectively for goal realization.
·
Knowledge Management is defined as the
systematic process of finding, selecting, organizing, and resenting information
in a way that improves employees’ comprehension in a specific area of interest.
A
simple definition of knowledge management is that it is ‘about connecting
people to people and people to information to create competitive advantage’. In
other words, it is the systematic process of finding, selecting, organizing,
distilling, and presenting information in a way that improves an employee’s
comprehension in a specific area of interest. It helps an organization to gain
insight and understanding from its own experiences. Knowledge management is first and foremost a
management discipline that treats intellectual capital as a managed asset.
Important Functions of Knowledge
Management
Knowledge
management functions are associated with different departments in different
organizations. It may be combined with quality, sales, HR, innovations,
operations etc and are likely to be determined by the knowledge management
motivation of that particular organization.
Knowledge
management is the collection of processes that govern the creation of
knowledge. Knowledge management is concerned of knowledge, dissemination of
knowledge, and the utilization of knowledge.
Knowledge
management means the ability to manage knowledge another term is information
management, this term came about when people realized that information is a
resource that can and needs to be managed to be useful in an organization.
Organizations are now starting to look at ‘knowledge’ as a resource as well.
i)
Knowledge
Analysis: It is necessary step for the ability to manage
knowledge and always its usefulness, its weaknesses and its appropriateness
within the organization.
ii)
Knowledge
Planning: When an organization has a grip on its knowledge,
it will be able to plan for the future. An organization will now be able to
develop a multi - year knowledge plan that defines how the organization will
develop its knowledge resources things training and development
programmed.
Dimensions
of Knowledge Management
A
dimension of knowledge distinguishes between tacit knowledge and explicit
knowledge.
ð Tacit Knowledge:
It represents internalized knowledge that an individual may not be consciously
aware of, such as how he or she accomplishes particular tasks.
ð Explicit Knowledge:
It represents knowledge that the individual holds consciously in mental focus,
in a form that can easily be communicated to others.
Hayes
and Walsham describe content and relational perspectives of knowledge and
knowledge management as two fundamentally different epistemological
perspectives. Knowledge is easily stored because it may be codified, while the
relational perspective recognizes the contextual and relational aspects of
knowledge which can make knowledge difficult to share outside of the specific
location where the knowledge is developed.
Process
of Knowledge Management
The process of
knowledge management covers information (both internal as well as external),
experiences of the employees, and details of the systems/ process. The aim is
to empower employees with the required information and knowledge in order to
improve their performance and productivity. The process of knowledge management
consists of other sub-processes starting from identifying knowledge to
retrieving and reusing organizational knowledge.
Knowledge
Management Strategies
Knowledge
may be accessed at three stages: before, during and after. knowledge management
– related activities. Different organizations have tried various knowledge
captures incentives, including making content submission mandatory and
incorporating rewards into performance measurement plans. Considerable
controversy exists over whether incentives work or not in this field and no
consensus has emerged.
i). Push Strategy:
The strategy to knowledge management involves actively managing knowledge. In
such an instance, individuals strive to explicitly encode their knowledge into
a shared knowledge repository, such as a database, as well as retrieving
knowledge they need that other individuals have provided to the repository.
This is also commonly known as the codification approach to knowledge
management.
ii). Pull Strategy:
The strategy to know involves individuals making knowledge requests of experts
associated with a particular subject on an ad hoc basis. In such an instance,
expert individuals can provide their insights to the particular person needing
this. This is also commonly known as the personalization approach to knowledge
management
Knowledge
Management System
Knowledge
management system refers to a system for managing knowledge in organizations
for supporting creation, capture, storage and dissemination of information. It
can comprise a part of a knowledge
management initiative. The idea of knowledge management system is to enable
employees to have ready access to the organization’s documented based of facts,
sources of information, and solutions. For example, a typical claim justifying
the creation of a knowledge management system might run something like this: an
engineer could know the metallurgical composition of an alloy that reduces
sound in gear systems. Sharing this information organization wide can lead to
more effective engine design and it could also lead to ideas for new improved
equipment.
Role
of Knowledge Managers
Knowledge
manager’s role has evolved drastically from that of one involving the creation
and maintenance of knowledge repositories to one that involves influencing the
culture of an organization toward improved knowledge sharing, reuse, learning,
collaboration and innovation.
Knowledge
managers have varied backgrounds ranging from information sciences to business
management. An effective knowledge manager is likely to be someone who has a
versatile skills portfolio and is comfortable with the concepts of organizational behavior and culture, processes, branding and
marketing and collaborative technology.
Managing Knowledge Workers
The
globalization of work and continuing advances in technology are changing the
nature of the workforce. Information specialists called knowledge workers are
equipped to maintain and expand the technological leadership role in the next
century are replacing blue-collar workers.
The
profile of knowledge workers is completely different from that of other types
of workforce. Knowledge economy derives its strengths from use of knowledge of
its HR. Human resource in knowledge economy are known as knowledge workers.
Though the concept of knowledge workers may include all HR who are primarily
engaged in getting things done through the use of knowledge.
Knowledge
workers are also called gold-collar workers, who are sometimes known by their
professional specialists, for example,
lawyer, doctor, programmer, information system designer, information
specialist, librarian, teacher, and scientist. Knowledge workers are also known
for their special characteristics. They are HR who can analyse, synthesize, and
evaluate information and use that information to solve various problems.
The
way of describing knowledge workers is by their skills and abilities: people
who are highly educated, creative, computer literate, and have portable skills
that make it possible for them to move anywhere their intelligence of talent
are needed. The employees in the IT industry are the best examples befitting this
concept.
Knowledge
workers basically use their intellect to transform ideas, products, services,
and processes. They own the knowledge, utilize it, and still own it. Their main
value to an organization is their ability to gather and analyse information and
make decisions that will benefit the company. They are also involved in a
continuous learning process as they are aware that knowledge has a limited
shelf life.
Knowledge
workers tend to be different from other workers; they have certain unique personality
and occupational characteristics. Because of unique characteristics of
knowledge workers, managing them effectively poses serious challenges before HR
professionals. Following characteristics of knowledge workers are important
from HRM point of view:
a) Challenging
jobs.
b) Autonomy
c) Immediate
feedback and reward
d) Professional
commitment
e) Lifestyle
Based
on the above characteristics of knowledge workers, HR professionals have to;
(i) recruit and select those knowledge workers who fit with overall job requirements.
Only technical competence of knowledge workers should not be taken into
consideration. Realizing the importance
of knowledge economy and the role of
knowledge workers therein many companies in knowledge economy have changed the
name of their HR department to knowledge management department.
The important aspect is
that the performance of an individual, organization, industry, or country in
acquiring and applying knowledge will increasingly become the key competitive
factor for success and income. In the long run, societies will emerge as knowledge
societies.
New
technologies, which are taking over many of the routine tasks performed in the
workplace, are directing workers towards the more complex tasks that require
thinking, understanding, assimilating, new knowledge, and problem solving. The
time-saving aspects of new technologies not only free employees for more
sophisticated tasks but also increase pressure on them to develop new skills
that will enable them to participate in the knowledge revolution that reflects
the changing nature of the workplace.
Research indicates that
organizations hire knowledge workers and leave them alone. They do not employ
quality measurements, Six Sigma, re-engineering, etc., or formally attempt to observe the flow of work. Further, they are not benchmarked,
and there is no accountability for the money and time spent on their
activities. Even if these assessments are attempted, the measurement yardsticks
are varied and subtle.
In
knowledge organizations, however, it is each worker’s knowledge and
intelligence that combine to form the means of production. The organization
cannot control or own that. A worker can leave at any time, taking the means of
production with him or her. Companies need to learn to look at employees as
assets to be valued rather than as costs. The value in a knowledge company lies
in the minds of the employees more than it does in the machinery on the factory
floor.
Knowledge
workers are essentially investors. They make discretionary choices as to how
and when their energies and skills may be invested in their companies. The
decision to invest or apply the skill may be contingent on (a) ability, (b)
motivation, and (c) opportunity available.
Organizations
across different sectors are attempting to identify ways to manage knowledge
workers. The methods being used include flexible work hours and environment,
accommodation and furnishing arrangements for the employees and their families,
opportunities for overseas scholarship, presentation of papers in conferences
or workshops, holidays with family members, celebration of events etc.
Another
vital requirement in managing the knowledge worker is developing an internal
infrastructure in the communications area. This can be facilitated by email to
all by way of virtual private net-workers and cohesive distributed systems and
having a standard organizational vocabulary. Any piece of information or
direction can be communicated instantly. The knowledge worker would gain by
this process and it would enhance their self-esteem.
Peter
F. Druker stated that a knowledge worker shines in a team. Employee teams may
be encouraged to meet, discuss, exchange, and build ideas, with no boundaries
and constraints of operations. Coaching and mentoring may be the process
involved. An open environment, easily accessible information or database,
clarity in performance expectations and goals, and immediate feedback would
enhance the self-esteem of the knowledge worker.
Boosting
the motivation levels of knowledge workers is critical to their performance. It
is observed that knowledge workers tend to openly communicate the meaning of
their work and are inclined towards information sharing. The knowledge workers
appreciates autonomy. They prefer to make their own decisions within their
sphere of competence. They seek the jobs where abilities get manifested. The
organizations may also take up wide participative management programmes,
strengthen their communication channels, and make resources available for their
employees. To provide a framework that would enhance the motivational levels of
the knowledge worker. However, since knowledge workers will dominate the future
workforce in organizations, the management must concentrate on how to retain,
maintain, and motivate them.
No comments:
Post a Comment