advertisement

Wednesday, 27 May 2015

Food Security and Second Green Revolution

Food Insecurity and Second Green Revolution
                                    

            In 1798, Thomas Malthus published his famous and often quoted essay on population, expressing concern about the human capacity to achieve a balance between population growth and the rate of growth in food production when global population was just about 930 million. The population of India alone now exceeds 990 million. There are growing apprehensions about the Malthusian prediction coming true during the early decades of the 21st century.(Parod,1999).
            The food security challenge has become a lot more complex today than it was in the 1950’s urbanization, globalization, private sector research and development  on the one hand, and the persistence of poverty and resource degradation on the other, have contributed to the growing complexity of the problems. The target population for food security policy is no longer for the rural poor, but it is increasingly urban based. The problem of food security  can no longer be managed simply by manipulating domestic policies, it has to be seen within  the context of global economic and trade policy. The importance of macro-economic and trade policy reform in sustainable food security cannot be under-estimated. Unless we get the macroeconomic and trade policies right, sustainable food security over long term will continue to be an elusive goal. The influence of WTO, in the new world order and ability of a  country to negotiate itself into a favourable position in the international arena contributes as much to its  food security as its ability to increase domestic production through technological change. (Prabhu,2002).
            Food security is not a problem of increasing production. It is the problem of improving access, it is a problem of equitable  distribution, it is also a problem of enhancing effective demand of the poorest of the poor for food. Food security  policy need not be anti-environment rational food protection systems that improve the efficiency of input and resource use, help conserve the natural resource base.
             
Significance of  Second Green Revolution
            India has to now embark upon the Second Green Revolution which   will enable it to further increase its productivity and diversity in the agricultural sector. The Second Green Revolution will have the farmers in focus, farming technology as the friend, food processing and marketing as partners and the consumers as the angels  to be satisfied. From now onwards to 2020, India would have to gradually increase the production to around 400 million tones of grains. The increase in the production will have to be done under the reduced availability of land from 170 million hectares to 100 million hectares with reduced water availability. We should also learn to diversify to meet specific consumer preferences, export markets and also in the interest of ecological balance. This is to be achieved through information access to all stakeholders and not with central controls or restriction of movements of agro products.
           The challenges for the scientists and technologies would be in the areas of development of seeds that would ensure good yield even under constraints of water and land with ecologically balanced farming. The challenges for the scientist is indeed  a knowledge graduation from characterization of soil to the matching of the seed with the composition of the fertilizer, water management and evolving new pre-harvesting  techniques for such conditions. The domain of farming would enlarge from grain production to food  processing and marketing. Newer forms of co-operative entities are required to be established for ensuring maximum benefit to the farmers. E-marketing concepts may also be put into practice to provide farmers’ choices in selling. Some of the areas which need focus are : soil upgradation, dryland agriculture, temperature and salinity resistant seeds and minimum water cultivation. Access to food will need enhanced of purchased power of the rural and urban population. This can only come out of employment generation through entrepreneurship and through increase in the incomes of existing farmers by techniques adopted.                   
           Agriculture farms the backbone of the Indian economy.  In India agriculture contribute to the economic development by providing food for sustenance, raw materials for industries and exports to earn valuable foreign exchange. Nearly 26 per cent of gross domestic product. Moreover, it creates employment opportunities for the rural workers. Eighty per cent of the population live in villages, with nearly 58.4 per cent (Census of India,2001) of them depending on agriculture.. In spite of  industrialization, agriculture  still holds a place of pride in India. India is one of the important developing countries where the role of agriculture is very crucial for sustaining and promoting economic development, as a vast segment of its population depends on it for its livelihood. 

WTO Impact on Indian Food Sector
            The WTO aims at improving  the standard of living,  employment and output and optimal utilization of the world resources. It will ensure preservation of environment all over the world. The thrust of its activities will be to secure better share of growth in international trade, especially, for the least developed countries.
           India has always been an agrarian economy with its objective of providing food for its growing and huge population. After the independence the policy had been to achieve self-sufficiency in foods. With this objective of self-sufficiency and bringing up the Indian agriculture and industry on par with the world Indian food sector has always been given an protected environment.   As a result food sector continued to be in its unorganized form. It is the middlemen who have been playing major role rather than producers and endusers. Of course there has been steady growth in the industry owing to domestic demand but never on an export oriented.     
            India is a agricultural nation where agricultural commodities contribute 25 per cent in total exports of the country. 58.4 per cent  of India’s population is directly or indirectly dependent on agriculture for their livelihood. In national income of India, 31 per cent is obtained from agricultural sector. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, it is necessary to study the possible effects will fall on Indian agriculture due to WTO agreement.  With this background the Indian food sector entered the uneven playground of world trade by signing the WTO.  The section of GATT, which deals on agriculture, related aspects are known by the name called Agreement On Agriculture (AOA). The main provision under agreement on agriculture having manifold impact on trade in agricultural products are food security should be made for needy  sections of population alone. Eligibility of such reservation is subject to “Clearly defined criteria related to nutritional objectives”. (Mathur,2001) 
            Though the economic reforms process started in 1991, it hardly covered the agricultural sector. In agriculture, the important state objective was to attain self-sufficiency in food which has since been more than achieved. Indian agriculture was also sought to be protected against external competition on the assumption that Indian agriculture, largely being of subsistence nature, would not be able to withstand competition from many developed countries where agriculture is commercially run and is highly technology intensive. The protection from import competition was essentially accorded by a strict regime of quantitative restrictions operated through the export and import policy of the country.
           The WTO regime had changed all these parameters. The right to impose quantitative controls on agricultural imports was drawn from Article 18-B of GATT under which a developing country fearing a threat of deterioration in the balance of payments could impose direct controls on imports which are otherwise prohibited under the WTO system. As a consequence of increasing foreign exchange reserves of India, some important trading partners felt that India should no longer enjoy the Balance Of Payments (BOP) cover as it has done before. Since India did not agree with that perception, the dispute went to the WTO’s dispute settlement system which ruled against India. As a result, quantitative restrictions on all imports, including agricultural products, were removed with effect from April 2001.
            Concerned with the possible increase in imports due to the removal of the quantitative restrictions, the Government of India has simultaneously imposed certain conditions which would make import of agricultural products difficult. Import of bulk agricultural commodities such as wheat, rice, maize, other coarse cereals, copra and coconut oil has been placed in the category of state trading which implies that only government nominated state trading enterprises will normally be allowed to trade in these products further, import of a large number of food products will have to comply with the domestic health standards and regulations. To ensure that import of agricultural products  do not result in infiltration of foreign diseases and pests in India, import of plants and products of animal origin has been subjected to sanitary and phytosanitary  permits to be issued by the Ministry of Agriculture. These are essentially efforts to provide continued protection to Indian agriculture in the post WTO regime.
            A comparison of the pre WTO situation with the post WTO environment is necessary to appreciate the role competitiveness will have to play in the survival of India’s agriculture. In the GATT, agriculture was kept out of the negotiations in trade liberalization. Most important members of the GATT were more concerned with achieving self-sufficiency in food to ensure food security for their own people and also provide protection to agricultural farmers because of their strong political clout  than in liberalizing trade in agriculture. (Bhattacharyya, 2002.)         
            The gap between potential and present yields is high in most farming systems, even with the technologies available on the self. High priority should hence go to bridging the productivity gap through a mutually reinforcing blend of technologies, services and public policies. Also, mainstreaming the nutritional dimension in the design of cropping and farming systems is essential. 
            We should aim to achieve revolutions in five areas to sustain and expand the gains already achieved. These are:
·         Productivity revolution  scope is great since average yields are still low in most cropping and farming systems. However, the production techniques should be environmentally sustainable, so that high yields can be obtained in perpetuity.
·         Quality revolution  can be achieved  through greater attention to post harvest technologies and bio-processing, as well as to sanitary  measures.
·         Income and employment revolution will call for an integrated attention to on-farm and non-farming livelihoods and to farming systems intensification, diversification and value addition. Post harvest processing offers scope for generating additional livelihoods through micro-enterprises supported by micro-credit.
·         Small farm management revolution is institutional structures which will confer upon farm families with small holdings the advantages of scale at both the production and post-harvest phases of agriculture are   urgently needed. For example, thanks to the cooperative method of organization of milk processing and marketing, India now occupies the first position in the world in milk production. Strategic partnership with the private sector will help farmers’ organizations to have access to assured and remunerative marketing opportunities. In relation to factors of production, water is likely to become the key constraint during this century. Hence every effort should be made to enhance productivity and income per every drop of water. Now, only rice and wheat dominate the food scene.
            For the first time in the history of independent India, we have an uncommon opportunity to launch a total attack on hunger. Both the huge grain stocks with government and the emergence of grassroots democratic systems of governance represented by Gram Sabhas and Gram Panchayats provide this uncommon opportunity. The Prime Minister of India which represents the 60th anniversary of India, as the target date for achieving a hunger-free India. This will be possible if a decentralized network of community food banks can be promoted. This will reduce transaction and transparent and corruption-free mechanism to ensure that the various entitlements for which provision is made in the budgets of the Union and State Governments reach the unreached. (Swaminathan,2002.)
Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam  opined that Food Security can be studied from three different view points. First, availability of food, which depends upon production and distribution; second, access to food that is guided by purchasing power; and third, food absorption. Food absorption implies being able to assimilate the food consumed in order to live a healthy and long life. This can come about with good sanitation facilities and better health care infrastructure. For enhanced production and distribution, we have to immediately launch the Second Green Revolution.   He observed, our country had demonstrated that food security is the foundation of our economic security, and economic security  leads to national security  and other forms of social security like health security and education and employment  opportunity, technology development, government policy making and management. etc.

Ensuring Food Security
      Food security is a physical, environmental, economic and social issue. It involves not just production, but access; not just output but process; not just technology but policy; not just global balance but also national conditions; not just national figures but household realities; not just rural but urban consumption; and not  just quantity of food but also quality.
·         The concept of food security should be broadened to make it holistic so as to mean “every individual has the physical, economic and environmental access to a balanced diet that includes the necessary macro and micro nutrients and safe drinking water, sanitation, environment hygiene, primary health care and education so as to lead  a healthy and productive life”.
·         Issues of food security are part of a bigger whole. Sustainable land and water management must be seen as directly linked to food security.
·         The major challenge is to produce additional food while conserving depleting natural resources. It is also to provide physical, economic and ecological access to food and nutrition security at the household level.
·         Nutrition security must be given integrated attention by emphasizing horticulture, animal husbandry, fishery, millets, pulses and several other resources for which India is traditionally known. Food security must not be based on market, but rather on self-reliance and sufficiency. 
·         The elimination of hunger and malnutrition is not just a food problem. It is linked to poverty and population growth. Rising food output is essential but so are the slowing  of population growth and maintaining the ecological balance.
·         Food banks at grass root levels should be well maintained.Identification of the vulnerable individuals and families suffering from endemic hunger and malnutrition. Ensuring safe drinking water and environmental hygiene. Strengthening food-based safety nets. Linking disaster mitigation with development. Assuring greater market access to form products.              
            The Common Minimum Programme of the new government at the Centre envisages extending the mid-day meal scheme to whole country. The programme also lays considerable stress on improving the country’s overall food and nutritional security status. For this purpose, it vows to prepare a comprehensive medium-term strategy for food and nutrition security. “The objective will be to move towards universal food security over time, if found feasible,” the programme document states. (Surinder,2004.)
            The food security equal involves researchers, politicians, local communities and also multinational corporations. Security is an issue of governance. Governance implies discipline in various instruments of government like legislatures, executives and judiciary. This discipline should imply objectivity and selflessness. It requires transparency in working and honesty in transaction, development without  security is unthinkable. From the angle of human development  security has many dimensions namely food security, social security, personal security, and environmental security.   
             The top five policy challenges that India faces over the next 20-25 years are (a) provisioning the urban masses especially the urban poor with adequate amounts of food and nutrition, (b) eliminating rural poverty and attacking the problem of chronic food insecurity, (c) repositioning Indian agriculture in the context of globalization, (d) dealing with rising transaction costs of technology access and technology use, and (e) sustainably managing the natural resource base. Over the past 50 years, the world has changed dramatically from one that was predominantly a rural based world to one where almost half the population is living in urban areas. today approximately 3 billion people live in urban areas. The UN projections show that by the year, 2030, five billion people will be living in urban areas as opposed to roughly three billion in rural areas. The growth in urban populations is most evident when we look at the growth of the mega-cities in the developing world. At the same time the locus of poverty is changing dramatically over time and is going to change even more over the next 20 years. We find that the poorest of the poor are moving into urban areas, expanding the urban slum populations in cities like Mumbai, Chennai, Kolkatta etc.

Conclusion
             Food security remains unrealized dream if issues such as poverty and population growth are not dealt with  effectively. The  Green Revolution is one of the biggest success stories in India cited globally, which enabled the country to self-sufficiency. The green revolution obviously, ushered to an era of overall rural prosperity. Its impact was so dramatic, that India became a role model to many developing nations.   Despite these impressive achievements there can be no complacency, especially in the view of emerging challenges of food security, poverty, and natural resource management as a country enters the new millennium. Food security exists when all people, at all times, have physical and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food to meet their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life.
            According to APJ Abdul Kalam, the development of education and healthcare will yield the benefits of smaller families and a more efficient workforce. It is the key to employability and social development. Improvements in the agricultural sector, including that of food processing, would lead to food security, employment opportunities and rapid economic growth. Growth in the information technology sector would assist rapid economic growth as well as play an important part in speeding up development.  
According to Prof. M.S. Swaminathan, “Food Security has three components. The first is food availability which depends on food protection and imports. The second is food access, which depends on purchasing power. The third, food absorption, is a function of safe drinking water, environmental hygiene, primary healthcare, and education”.                
Success always has its cause and green revolution has been no exception. The environmental and health impacts are due to the increased  use of chemicals, pesticides, fertilizers, through the green revolution. The indigenous land races have been replaced by the new high yielding varieties. We are now facing with second generation problems of the first green revolution such as depletion of soil  nutrients and water resources, creation of salinity, water logging, resurgence pests and diseases and increased environmental pollution etc. The second green revolution conceived should be able to put agriculture as well as agriculture related industry on fast track to provide jobs with higher wages.  The second green revolution, and productivity improvements should come from sources that are ecologically friendly. The government has to ensure that there is no income loss to the farmers and it is compensated by the realization of appropriate  market price to these crops. 
Simultaneous improvement in education, technical improvement, health on the one hand, thrust in agro processing industries on the other would provide next generation with the jobs. The industrial growth would also pickup on the strength of rural income growth. There is a need for investment in second green  revolution from the public and private sectors. Decentralized approach and sound planning are a must. Agro processing, development of livestock sector and fisheries development would add job opportunities in the short run. Second green revolution requires water conservation, massive afforestation  and improvement of vegetative cover in the watersheds. Commercial exploitation of dense forests are needs to be stopped. If mining is allowed  from private parties there will not be any forest left in India. In future government should encourage Vermi Compost (organic fertilizers), and green manure in place of chemical fertilizers to reduce the expenditure and salinity of soil.        
            The production target of 360  millions of tonnes of food grains with  increase in horticulture, life stock, and fishing production will be adequate to meet the food and nutrition requirements and make India hunger free. From now on to 2020, India would have to gradually increase the production to around 400 million tonnes of food grains.  In order to overcome food security issue there is a need to change the way  research has to be done to harness synergies between institutions, development of networks to assess challenges and opportunities associated with globalisation, technology revolutions in the fields of monocular  biology, bio-technology, micro-biology, system analysis, space science and revolution informatics etc.
Many   food security schemes are being introduced by the government strong in concept but weak in implementation. The problem of food security is multifaceted. If population increases at present rate, it is not only food security but problems of shelter will also arise.  It is high time that people should extend their co-operation with the government in population control.  It requires  100 per cent literacy, scientific(Sri Vari), technical knowledge, information technology in all walks of life. People should also change their mind set to meet the need of the hour. 
Reference
1). APJ Abdul Kalam(2004), “Providing Urban Amenities in Rural Areas(PURA) in Action”,
      Yojana, Vol 48, No. 4, April 2004, New Delhi.
2). APJ Adbul Kalam (2002), Ignited Minds, Penguin Books India Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi.
3). Archana Sinha (2004), “Rural Women in Dynamics of Agriculture & Food Security”,
      Kurukshtra, Vol. 52, no. 9, July 2004. New Delhi.  
4). Bhagyalakshmi. J (2004), “Reducing Food Insecurity Through Grain Banks”, Yojana, Vol 48,
      No. 4, April 2004, New Delhi.
5). Battacharayya. B (2002), “Global Competitiveness of Indian Agriculture”. Yojana, Vol.:46,
      January 2002, New Delhi
6). Mathur. B.L.(2001), “WTO and Indian Agriculture”, Association of Indian Management
     Schools Institute of Transport Management Vol :2, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam.  
7). Prabhu Pingali (2002), “Food Security Challenge-Plagued by Complex Issues”, The Hindu
      Survey of Indian Agriculture 2002, Chennai.
8). Paroda R.S (1999), “For a Food Secure Future”,  The Hindu Survey of Indian Agriculture
      1999, Chennai.
9).Surinder Sud(2004), “Food Availability and Revamped PDS”, Yojana, Vol.48,August 2004.
     New Delhi.  
10). Surinder Sud (2004), “Issues of Food Security”,  Yojana, Vol 48, No. 4, April 2004, New
       Delhi.
11). Swaminathan. M.S (2002), “Food Security and Community Grain Banks”, Yojana, Vol 46, 
        January 2002, New Delhi
12). Swarna Sadasivanm Vepa (2004), “Second Green Revolution: A Catalyst For Rural Uplift”,
        Yonana, Vol. 48, August 2004. New Delhi

                                                                                                 




  



                                    













  


 


 

 



No comments:

Post a Comment